Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC01431FAF for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 04:02:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4YHgCNOM3Cs0 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 04:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABBC3431FAE for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 04:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VUE0d-0001bG-4Y; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:02:23 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 19848 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:02:19 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Felipe Contreras , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] General fixes In-Reply-To: <1380558523-6913-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> References: <1380558523-6913-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16+92~g54c40fb (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:02:19 -0300 Message-ID: <87txgpv16s.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:02:28 -0000 Felipe Contreras writes: > Felipe Contreras (3): > query: bind queries to database objects > ruby: allow build with RUNPATH > ruby: bind database close()/destroy() properly Hi Felipe; I agree with the discussion on IRC that the change in the first patch makes sense. It would be nice to have a bit more explanation in the commit message of the second message; at least to point out that (iiuc) this is not a really a ruby specific thing, just a standard ld.so feature. d