Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F9940D162 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:01:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=unavailable Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id neRKuF43FMZ6 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9A940D168 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4]) by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E606C19F331A; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:01:24 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1]) by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new, port 10044) with ESMTP id GinE-NXTZOlP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:01:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34]) by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA1A19F32FD; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:01:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wsheee.2x.cz (charon.finaltek.com [217.11.241.201]) (Authenticated sender: sojkam1) by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C23AFA005; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:01:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wsh by wsheee.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PCAcX-0004ho-ES; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:33:17 +0200 From: Michal Sojka To: Carl Worth , Igor Shenderovich , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: utf-8 in author field In-Reply-To: <87pquspm6c.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <87vdanrmfo.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> <87pquspm6c.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-113-g782e2e3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:33:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87ocabvp0y.fsf@wsheee.2x.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:01:39 -0000 --=-=-= On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Carl Worth wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2010 09:56:27 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > > On Fri, 14 May 2010, Igor Shenderovich wrote: > > > What should one do to see the true list of authors? > > > > I encounter the same when headers are not encoded properly according to > > RFC 2047. I commonly see the violation of section 5, paragraph (3), > > sentence "An 'encoded-word' MUST NOT appear within a 'quoted-string'". > > That is when the encoded word is enclosed in double quotes. I guess, the > > "problem" is not only notmuch related, but all users of gmime library > > must be affected. > [...] > My guess is that the best we could do is to come up with some heuristics > for recognizing a non-RFC-compliant header here and munging it. And the > heuristics could then fail with messages that were RFC-compliant and > intentionally including a string of characters that would match the > heuristic, (which would presumably be rare, but not impossible---so > perhaps we would then need some configuration). I think that other, more mature, users of gmime library (Evolution?) must use such heuristics. We may look for insporation there. > Anyway, if one of you could send an example of a misbehaving message, I > might like to look at it and perhaps add it to the test suite to see if > there's anything we can safely do about it. I attach one such message. -Michal --=-=-= Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline; filename*0*=us-ascii''1288208842_5.30413.wsheee%2cU%3d8900%2cFMD5%3d3a8e4; filename*1*=c06e471595f6eb262bb9b5582d9%3a2%2cS Return-Path: X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3 X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS Received: from liszt.debian.org (liszt.debian.org [82.195.75.100]) by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C01619F3380 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:01:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP id 3EF7A13A4FE5; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Old-Return-Path: X-Original-To: lists-debian-devel@liszt.debian.org Delivered-To: lists-debian-devel@liszt.debian.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D913813A4A7D for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:01:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-12 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, STATIC_RIMA_TDE=-5] autolearn=ham Received: from liszt.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525) with ESMTP id obJuGli7s+tD for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:01:23 +0000 (UTC) X-policyd-weight: using cached result; rate: -6.1 Received: from mithrandir.undominio.net (65.Red-88-2-199.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.2.199.65]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A35B13A48D3 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mithrandir.undominio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956C925C249 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:01:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mithrandir.undominio.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mithrandir.undominio.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id zcCCG1n+oJfZ for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:01:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mithrandir.undominio.prv (mithrandir.undominio.prv [192.168.0.1]) by mithrandir.undominio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CF925C23C for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:01:06 +0200 (CEST) From: "=?utf-8?q?Jes=C3=BAs_M=2E?= Navarro" To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: debian can be better Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:01:06 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201010271601.06645.jesus.navarro@undominio.net> X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/266059 X-Loop: debian-devel@lists.debian.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Hi, Pedro Paolo: On Wednesday 27 October 2010 14:46:08 Pedro Paulo Argolo wrote: > Debian > needs better support video cards from Nvidia and ATI video boards > Intel. I had configuration problems because of that, and for a typical > user is a very embarrassing situation. ~: ( You should ask for that to Nvidia. You can bet the day Nvidia produces proper open source drivers will be the day Debian will be able to properly support them. Of course you can think the Ubuntu way is the proper one and Debian's[1] is not but, of course too, you are absolutly free to use Ubuntu instead of Debian. Cheers. [1] http://www.debian.org/social_contract -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201010271601.06645.jesus.navarro@undominio.net --=-=-=--