Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4CF6DE1603 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 04:24:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.484 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.260, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K_gio3c911lS for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 04:24:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89B5F6DE1403 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 04:24:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zei9W-0001rD-Hv; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:23:58 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 24427 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:23:39 -0000 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cli: convert remainder of CLI to n_q_search_{messages,threads}_st In-Reply-To: <1441545347-29549-3-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> References: <1441545347-29549-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <1441545347-29549-3-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+73~gd432116 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:23:39 -0300 Message-ID: <8737y54bwk.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:24:35 -0000 David Bremner writes: > I think it would be no real problem to cut and paste the gdb based > error message test from count to the other clients modified here, but > I'm not currently convinced it's worth the trouble since the code path > being tested is almost the the same, and the tests are relatively > heavyweight. I have pushed this commit to master. The changes are hopefully pretty straightforward. d