From: Florian Friesdorf <flo@chaoflow.net>
To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
	Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>,
	Daniel Schoepe <daniel.schoepe@googlemail.com>,
	Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>, mueen@nawaz.org, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: Header and other questions
In-Reply-To: <8762pabodc.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
References: <878vu8edvf.fsf@fester.com> <m2sjsfmxvo.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87hb8vwqww.fsf@lucky.home> <87vcxad6d6.fsf@gilead.home.box>
	<874o4uy8av.fsf@gogo.home>
	<8762pabodc.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 12:59:48 +0200
Message-ID: <87zkmlegnv.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 16 May 2011 09:29:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestr=
ucture.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu> =
wrote:
> > The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive
> > for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region
> > without thinking about it, that this approach would make sense for the
> > emacs interface. In other words, keep the emacs interface emacsy. I
> > think I still agree with that, since I feel like having both would be
> > confusing (what do you do when you select a marked-line in a region?)
> > and I like the one I tend toward intuitively. But I certainly see the
> > benefit of the other functionality as well.
>=20
> I should mention that in my experience it's usually not that hard to
> construct searches (or filters on searches) that pair down to just the
> messages you want to tag, in which case you can just tag the entire
> buffer.

Maybe its more a question of key bindings:
1. add some special tag to messages
2. filter on this tag
3. do something with the whole buffer
4. remove special tag from all messages
5. close filter

I'd welcome a standard set of key bindings for it.

=2D-=20
Florian Friesdorf <flo@chaoflow.net>
  GPG FPR: 7A13 5EEE 1421 9FC2 108D  BAAF 38F8 99A3 0C45 F083
Jabber/XMPP: flo@chaoflow.net
IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
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=9j9H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--