Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6210431FAF
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 8YzJpbdNp1t7 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF879431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net
	([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet)
	by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
	id 1SOZyQ-00047L-AH; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:40:02 -0300
Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
	id 1SOZyL-0006pD-0o; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:39:53 -0300
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: priorities for 0.13
In-Reply-To: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet>
References: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+140~g0c819b9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:39:52 -0300
Message-ID: <87ehr6fhtj.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam_bar: -
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:40:09 -0000

David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:

> Hi All;
>
> I'd like to have a feature freeze for 0.13 sometime in the first week of
> May.  What do people feel are priorities to try to get reviewed and
> pushed for 0.13?
>

So here are some patches that people expressed interest in for 0.13, but
need more review.

     id:"1335056093-17621-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca"

     id:"1334431301-27303-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com"

     id:"1335651473-19652-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu"

Note that in particular it makes sense to push amdragon's changes while
we are bumping the SONAME.
        
The sequence by Jamie

    id:"1334429574-12918-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"

Has only one minor comment about a comment; I'm not sure it's enough for
a rebase on it's own.  Mark, what do you think?

d