Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC424196F0 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:56:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vFimtL1N8htN for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C615431FC1 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so603510wyj.26 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:56:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.162.149 with SMTP id y21mr1230163wek.196.1272279407604; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:56:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ut.hh.sledj.net (host83-217-165-81.dsl.vispa.com [83.217.165.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r29sm735075wbv.21.2010.04.26.03.56.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ut.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD98159413B; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:56:44 +0100 (BST) To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] notmuch.pod: pod version of documentation, converted by rman, massaged by hand. In-Reply-To: <87wrvxc5fi.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca> References: <1262281169-24909-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <87wrvxc5fi.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-191-g4256215 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: David Edmondson Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:56:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87eii25vo3.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:56:49 -0000 On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:04:49 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > As I'm faced with writing docs for output selection, I'd like to revisit > this idea. I didn't get any feedback, positive or negative about the > idea of keeping the docs in pod. I don't care much about the format, > but I think it would be nice to avoid maintaining two copies of the > documentation. > > Should I rebase/rebuild this against the current docs, or not bother? I like the idea, but I have no experience with pod. dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org