Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF76429E29 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 05:23:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2muk+5dfNJru for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 05:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gw3.nixu.fi (mail-gw3.nixu.fi [193.209.237.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B127431FD0 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 05:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (mail-gw3 [127.0.0.1]) by mail-gw3.nixu.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id q02DNIUn018492; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 15:23:18 +0200 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31]) by mail-gw3.nixu.fi with ESMTP id 114cs0wwv3-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:23:18 +0200 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31]) by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id q02DNHXQ002822; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 15:23:17 +0200 From: Tomi Ollila To: Jani Nikula , David Bremner , David Edmondson , Dmitry Kurochkin , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] emacs: unify search mechanisms In-Reply-To: <87boqoap4o.fsf@nikula.org> References: <1324786495-14221-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> <87aa6a6rxi.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87boqoap4o.fsf@nikula.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+157~g442d405 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.5.7110, 1.0.211, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-01-02_03:2012-01-02, 2012-01-02, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1201020088 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:23:24 -0000 On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:42:47 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:43:37 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > > > Personally I would like to be able to customize the hello screen to > > remove the search box. I find it confusing that that 's' jumps to the > > search box there, and everywhere else brings up the mini-buffer. That > > might be just me, and the fact that I bind "C-c s" globally to > > notmuch-search. I could easily believe that for new users having a > > search box is nicer. > > Would it be a suitable compromise to bind 's' to notmuch-search (the > mini-buffer search) also in notmuch-hello, while leaving the search box > there with a common history? I like this approach! > I'm not sure moving the point to search box needs a keybinding (but > notmuch-hello-goto-search could still be there if the user wants to add > a keybinding). yes. > > > BR, > Jani. Tomi