Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F13431FC4 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 13:11:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o7+SJ7owYRH9 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 13:11:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91C1B431FBC for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 13:11:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WnCpo-0006Mm-Ve; Wed, 21 May 2014 20:09:57 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 5712 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 21 May 2014 20:09:41 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , Fraser Tweedale , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure: use cc/c++ when GCC not installed In-Reply-To: References: <1400662721-68562-1-git-send-email-frase@frase.id.au> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 13:09:41 -0700 Message-ID: <878upu6ghm.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 20:11:29 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: > > hash is builtin in modern shells, and is command in some systems > which(1) is builtin in zsh (only?). Solaris 10 which(1) exits 0 > even the command is not found. > > Tomi I thought "command -v" was the posix way of testing for a binary? d