Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C56431FD0 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:07:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.789 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8hxI5BrP9uvJ for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:07:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AE53431FB6 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:07:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so2699456wyb.26 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:07:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=Bhj8g6eKYT34E/mbJ0GS7hSt2YisriYvQZS2hCxqcsI=; b=mAxGQ8UBPD1jHXBn5Q3D3rxnRNXVlLSap8S3yqsih8OyuzBSHI4f+ADZ47mYeqL0Fi I3Q+jZv24PlcHs3R1b3beSBHCYlNbLfrVu0VuFzPnQbR9YYWNN285wcd2byI+rgPnEen n2brttKpPCrFjXTj8plG1lvQETNTrM46rrSyA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=F00zRmbf73jwB9vgKBq15dssM4ruwrP3dWhUe4g0HLmIS8jtIOyj7nEeHU25rC9Rer pSofEWXBfmQmTlrQkvJEgL+2B3veDUctGffJLGnGsim26C84uOvDjPlhWipSWi6Y6hsx HAvgrdJhJVlMvbdx4DUDH/PUNKcFPTEfVLvFg= Received: by 10.227.174.13 with SMTP id r13mr5493889wbz.81.1308596862703; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:07:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (pc-88068.lal.in2p3.fr [134.158.88.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fr17sm2579147wbb.23.2011.06.20.12.07.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:07:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Sebastien Binet To: Jameson Graef Rollins , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: bug in emacs-ui ? In-Reply-To: <87k4cgcqos.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> References: <8739j5rn2d.fsf@cern.ch> <87pqm8cz4f.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <87oc1spkkc.fsf@cern.ch> <87mxhccw9v.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <87hb7kpi7e.fsf@cern.ch> <87k4cgcqos.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/ (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:06:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87aadcnx0e.fsf@cern.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:07:46 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:18:11 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: Non-text part: multipart/signed > On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:43:01 +0200, Sebastien Binet = wrote: > > > You didn't try forwarding the email to the list ;) > > ah! that easy, heh ? > > > > Attachment: 1300323326_0.6276.farnsworth,U=3D250482,FMD5=3Daf1cd994dfcb= 9286c394d142687ff5a0:2,S (application/octet-stream) >=20 > Are you sure this is the right message? This message doesn't include > any signature section that looks like the one that you posted before. > The one you posted in your previous message was: >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Message sent via/by LCG Savannah > http://savannah.cern.ch/ >=20 > This one is: >=20 > _______________________________________________ > announce mailing list > announce@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/announce it is indeed another message but one which presents the same problem (the other one was from a semi-private mailing list...) >=20 > Also (unrelated) I notice that the above attached message is not > content-type "message/rfc822". Specifying the right content type helps=20 > receivers handle the messages a little better. duly noted. =2Ds =2D-=20 ######################################### # Dr. Sebastien Binet # Laboratoire de l'Accelerateur Lineaire # Universite Paris-Sud XI # Batiment 200 # 91898 Orsay ######################################### --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk3/miEACgkQPj4AVbsZCCZ7KQCgipYV4laOVS8sn+7RolrNtJHL 9XcAniyQxkBM/LalGNQ09ZpCUqxTK3RO =foX/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--