Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A37429E22 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 10:00:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tts3rjW2Yk9p for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 10:00:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sflc.info (mail.sflc.info [216.27.154.199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D6DF429E20 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 10:00:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.2.67.174]) by mail.sflc.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C44FBB4C057; Mon, 9 May 2011 17:00:52 +0000 (UTC) From: James Vasile To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: release-candidate/0.6 In-Reply-To: <87k4e0g06r.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> References: <8762pn7gth.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <87bozfpemp.fsf@softwarefreedom.org> <87k4e0g06r.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-216-g76ea9ab (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 13:00:54 -0400 Message-ID: <87pqnrolkp.fsf@softwarefreedom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 17:00:57 -0000 On Sun, 08 May 2011 17:57:48 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Fri, 06 May 2011 19:56:30 -0400, James Vasile wrote: > > I sent two patches to the list on March 16. They were a bug fix to > > allow notmuch to correctly handle some poorly formatted email. Nobody > > ever replied, but I'd like to see the bug fixed nonetheless, as it > > results in unreadable mail. Since I've actually seen such mail in the > > wild, I'd like to see Notmuch handle it. > > Hey, James. Florian Friesdorf sent in a patch to sanitize the output of > notmuch search, which I think is the issue that you're patches were also > dealing with. Florian's patch has be pushed to my > release-candidate/0.6. Can you see if your issue is fixed there? If > not maybe you could try submitting a new patch that would apply to the > release-candidate/0.6 head. > > Thanks. I'll take a look at it this week. Thanks much.