Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: notmuch-vimpy
Message-ID: <20120115153408.30382.40507@daenerys.khirnov.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:34:08 +0100
References: <20120114075443.27927.39754@daenerys.khirnov.net>
	<87r4z1iudw.fsf@zancas.localnet>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: <87r4z1iudw.fsf@zancas.localnet>
From: Anton Khirnov <anton@khirnov.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] vim plugin rewrite II
Precedence: list


On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:15:07 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:54:43 +0100, anton@khirnov.net wrote:
> > =

> > The advantages over current vim client are still the following:
> > * sending and displaying/saving attachments
> > * much better unicode support
> > * tag name and search commands completion
> > * proper representation of the thread structure
> > * easier to extend thanks to python's massive standard library
> > =

> > Please comment.
> =

> Hi Anton;
> =

> I'm not a vim user, so I probably can't say anything very helpful, but
> it does sound like some nice improvements.  Hopefully one of our vim
> front-end users can comment a bit more.  One thing I wondered about is
> if your version is still completely synchronous, with the resulting
> problems dealing with large (say, more than 10000 messages) search
> results?
> =


Yes, it's still synchronous. I suppose making it asynchronous shouldn't
be all that hard, i just never found enough time and motivation for that
(it was never a huge problem here).

-- =

Anton Khirnov