From: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
To: Mark Anderson <MarkR.Anderson@amd.com>, Jesse Rosenthal
	<jrosenthal@jhu.edu>, "notmuch\@notmuchmail.org" <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [notmuch] Bulk message tagging
In-Reply-To: <3wdmxxg4axm.fsf@testarossa.amd.com>
References: <m2tyrrkf32.fsf@deb.maillard.im> <87sk7b30tg.fsf@jhu.edu>
	<m2bpdye86s.fsf@deb.maillard.im> <3wdmxxg4axm.fsf@testarossa.amd.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:56:48 +0200
Message-ID: <m2wrwf76n3.fsf@deb.maillard.im>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Precedence: list

Hi,

On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:51:01 -0600, Mark Anderson <MarkR.Anderson@amd.com> wrote:
> 
> I think that '*' is definitely an awesome command, but I wonder if we
> shouldn't have another command for the notmuch-search buffer which means
> 'tag all the threads that I can see in this buffer'.

This is exactly what my initial post asked for. '*' is not
totally satisfying for me due to the "limitations" you
exposed. Though It is a good and acceptable workaround for me.
As said, I just have to pay attention to redo my search query
before pressing the '*' key.

Xavier