Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E892431FC0; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:19:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CL9b6SVoeyRW; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:19:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECD7431FAE; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:19:44 -0800 (PST) From: Carl Worth To: Keith Packard , notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <1258493565-13508-1-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com> References: <1258493565-13508-1-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:19:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87d43axi4e.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Make notmuch-show 'X' (and 'x') commands remove inbox (and unread) tags X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:19:45 -0000 On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:32:45 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > When closing a thread view, mark the thread as archived by removing > the "inbox" tag, and for the 'x' variant, the "unread" tag as well, > then kill the buffer and update the search window view as well. I'm starting to come around to this patch, Keith. :-) I think one thing we're going to really need is a better help message for presenting the keybindings. The function names are all really confusing, (the "notmuch-show" prefix doesn't help). So what I'd really like is something that displays the keybinding and the first line of the documentation of a function, rather than the function name itself. > This makes 'x' much the same as 'a', but instead of taking you to the > next message, it takes you back to the search window instead. Except that the patch also reverses the current behavior of "a" and "A". That should be a separate patch anyway, but I'm also not sure that I like it. I like that the command that takes the extra effort of pressing shift is the command that does *more*, (removing both "unread" and "inbox"), rather than the command that does *less*. -Carl