Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD7B431FD2 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:00:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P5Ct8Wr3joTa for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:00:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru-group.fi [87.108.86.66]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814D6431FBC for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:00:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7B34A68056; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:00:22 +0200 (EET) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Edmondson , Pieter Praet Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Add `notmuch-show-stash-gmane' and `notmuch-show-stash-gmane-and-go'. In-Reply-To: References: <1327397873-20596-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> <1327452608-8247-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+116~g34d80c9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Notmuch Mail X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:00:22 -0000 On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:41:26 +0000, David Edmondson wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:18:22 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:31:43 +0000, David Edmondson wrote: > > > > > > Your point about Gmane not having everything applies equally to any > > > service, suggesting that perhaps the user should also have an option to > > > choose which service to use at stash time. Thoughts? > > > > Completing-read which has all choice url's expanded so user may even edit > > those > > `completing-read' on the _names_ of the services, sure. I'm not sure > that showing the URLs as a set of choices would be nice. Hmm... yes. Editing is not important here. > > > (like fix -2- to -1- if the don't have cover letter ;) > > Should a single patch need a cover letter? Nope -- and forget this -- I thought this a bit wrong. So, 'completing-read' -- or something that does the same thing better (ymmv). Tomi