Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E906DE1320 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 04:57:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.719 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wXM0YGbHXfyC for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 04:57:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806356DE0A87 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 04:57:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1961910007F; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 14:57:36 +0200 (EET) From: Tomi Ollila To: Bart Bunting , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Question re undo In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g022a785 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 12:57:24 -0000 On Sat, Nov 21 2015, Bart Bunting wrote: > Hi there, > > I've accidentally removed a bunch of tags in error and was dreaming > there may be a way to fix it :). > > Is there any way to restore tags as they were at a certain point in > time? some examination of lastmod: might help ? first run notmuch count --lastmod Then experiment with `notmuch search lastmod:` with "suitable" values of num to figure out of the messages that have been affected... Tomi > Even if not now after i've done it, is there anything that could have been > done at the time to fix the error? probably not. > > Kind regards > Bart > -- >