Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D7C431FAE for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:06:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.475 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.475 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599] autolearn=unavailable Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qDDGeYBdWuRN for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:06:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from clegg.madduck.net (clegg.madduck.net [193.242.105.96]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762F0431FBC for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:06:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from lapse.rw.madduck.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:a60:f069:0:20e:9bff:fea9:3aaa]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "lapse.rw.madduck.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (verified OK)) by clegg.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTPS id D7B321D4099; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:06:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by lapse.rw.madduck.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 65F6D823; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:06:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:06:36 +0100 From: martin f krafft To: Carl Worth Message-ID: <20100225080636.GC31107@lapse.rw.madduck.net> Mail-Followup-To: Carl Worth , Sebastian Spaeth , notmuch@notmuchmail.org References: <87d411zvz8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <20100125213231.GB15987@lapse.rw.madduck.net> <960df8f6a8a08f2ca3aceef5a216d691.squirrel@webmail.sspaeth.de> <87wrz4fqsw.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net> <20100127194149.GA23034@lapse.rw.madduck.net> <20100128070522.GA18649@ukfsn.org> <20100201223112.GA20288@lapse.rw.madduck.net> <20100210032503.GA19427@lapse.rw.madduck.net> <87aavhsaqq.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87pr3uwixi.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pr3uwixi.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin' X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux squeeze/sid kernel 2.6.32-2-686 i686 X-Spamtrap: madduck.bogus@madduck.net X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at clegg X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [notmuch] patchwork test instance X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:06:53 -0000 --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable also sprach Carl Worth [2010.02.24.2008 +0100]: > I agree that in its current form it's not useful, (it seems to be just a > long list of the patches that have ever been submitted). >=20 > I seem to recall Martin saying that patches that get accepted will be > automatically detected and removed from the list. Is that successfully > happening now? Yes, I've automatically tagged approx. 140 patches "accepted" so far. > In the meantime, if someone does want to push some buttons in > patchwork, nothing before 2009-12-01 at least is interesting. Okay, all of those can be tagged superseeded. --=20 martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ =20 kermit: why are there so many songs about rainbows? fozzy: that's part of what rainbows do. =20 spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="digital_signature_gpg.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAkuGL4YACgkQIgvIgzMMSnXBWACff8koe1dbxbdlPTEzwy+y6rzx oa0AoM7RQTxpmY9EjGpuwe7Z7bsbM9FP =tlDA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6--