From: Mark Anderson <MarkR.Anderson@amd.com>
To: Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu>, Mark Anderson <ma.skies@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test:Folder tags shouldn't match after removal of file in
	given folder
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikhyA-9hrr8WfJvYP50OcYPsMiiuQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87sjqvw64n.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikhyA-9hrr8WfJvYP50OcYPsMiiuQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-171-gcb84187 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1
	(i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:57:53 -0600
Message-ID: <3wd62nqubke.fsf@testarossa.amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "notmuch@notmuchmail.org" <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Precedence: list

On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:58:00 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu> wrot=
e:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Mark Anderson <ma.skies@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +test_begin_subtest "Test matches folder:spam"
> > +output=3D$(notmuch search folder:spam)
> > +test_expect_equal "$output" "thread:0000000000000001 =C2=A0 2001-01-05=
 [1/1] Notmuch Test Suite; Test message #1 (inbox unread)"
> > +
> > +sleep 1;
>=20
> I assume this has to do with directory mtime's.  Is it sufficient to
> instead increment_mtime $dir/spam after the rm below?

I believe that would be sufficient.  I just had one of my runs fail to
even remove the filename, and I remember some earlier discussion along
these lines, but I just used the fastest way, I can certainly modify it
to use "increment_mtime"

>=20
> > +
> > +test_begin_subtest "Remove folder:spam copy of email"
> > +rm $dir/spam/$(basename $file_x)
> > +output=3D$(NOTMUCH_NEW)
> > +test_expect_equal "$output" "No new mail. Detected 1 file rename."
> _______________________________________________
> notmuch mailing list
> notmuch@notmuchmail.org
> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
>=20