Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E27431FAF for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 07:21:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pKwCz1OC+p-7 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 07:21:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63926431FAE for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 07:21:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4361000E2; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:21:43 +0200 (EET) From: Tomi Ollila To: david@tethera.net, notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] notmuch-restore: tidy formatting In-Reply-To: <1352943202-1431-3-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> References: <1352943202-1431-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <1352943202-1431-3-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+84~g8a199bf (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: David Bremner X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:21:45 -0000 On Thu, Nov 15 2012, david@tethera.net wrote: > From: David Bremner > > This is again the work of uncrustify. > > I remember there is some controversy about "! foo" versus "!foo", but > in context I think "! foo" looks OK. Also, for functions "! foo > (blah)" seems better than "!foo (blah)". Currently: $ egrep '! ' *.c | wc 19 108 1074 $ egrep '![^ =]' *.c | wc 41 250 2223 Anyway IIRC Carl preferred the ! foo format and the code might have drifted away from that... Whatever this choice will eventually be for "pure" notmuch code should not affect what the code that can be considered as external libraries should be formatted; e.g. parse-time-string code should keep the formatting Jani prefers. The uncrustify.cfg option 'sp_not' affects whether there is space after ! or not -- and it can even be configured to 'ignore' this case. Tomi // patch dropped.