Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90808431E64
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat,  3 May 2014 07:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.7
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 595cbt0a+e2A for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sat,  3 May 2014 07:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com
 [74.125.83.44])	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))	(No client
 certificate requested)	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
 0248A431FDA	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat,  3 May 2014 07:01:27 -0700
 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id c41so3899834eek.31
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 03 May 2014 07:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references
	:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
	bh=y1SjaLB0npjDd18XHAIqTPnQKXro+GjR2/q4vA/rHBs=;
	b=FlN27DJaaRhtY96v2om992AIJSH4C6TcSFYCa//I8ITrPFn9EhV3HzURQIyQnq2pkz
	RCUdSqtdlajRo2xTpC7TbIAMRV58crJ9oeEk3s6a712/7wFfYtHzBV2hdn7YIL3g7BVc
	6F7lAhL+4DIxqxTXdqARToH1Cv3dYPsUWSF4nuw58XWyj6lbbMoe2QdEqfdms13mSy79
	c5NkWMjqqwxFateLP6DOYGyh3+OFNmHDJiu7H132BuzgO075QLHmsG6PpTG0G2y4MkW6
	RDI9wIhVh+JAuZ5YVuyPtHyeVwqbFZ/QgDdxlt+cGPBOgzQF4DKP10eeeS3vl24fHO5s
	I7Kg==
X-Gm-Message-State:
 ALoCoQm++dFg33wkzgvxhKpBw+8jnT+1prP5RI0rbYntO6OVOdhQoKg0CrWWGlwyTxkjCw8IpbPX
X-Received: by 10.15.73.134 with SMTP id h6mr20719401eey.3.1399125685200;
	Sat, 03 May 2014 07:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw2-58c36f-91.dhcp.inet.fi.
	[88.195.111.91])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 44sm13051235eek.30.2014.05.03.07.01.23
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Sat, 03 May 2014 07:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, David Mazieres expires 2014-07-10 PDT
	<mazieres-7je64uqare55j4eig77r2axtva@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>,
	Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add configurable changed tag to messages that have
	been	changed on disk
In-Reply-To: <87mwfq4k0q.fsf@zancas.localnet>
References: <1396800683-9164-1-git-send-email-eg@gaute.vetsj.com>
	<87wqf2gqig.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <1397140962-sup-6514@qwerzila>
	<87wqexnqvb.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu>
	<87k3aw5dj5.fsf@zancas.localnet>
	<877g6v3lb9.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu>
	<87mwfq4k0q.fsf@zancas.localnet>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18~rc0+2~gbc64cdc (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 17:01:22 +0300
Message-ID: <87wqe3x8p9.fsf@nikula.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 14:01:34 -0000

On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
> dm-list-email-notmuch@scs.stanford.edu writes:
>
>>
>> As far as updating the test suite, etc., it's almost certain that the
>> core notmuch developers would be unsatisfied with whatever I've done,
>> since the code base is very clean and has a very uniform style.  So when
>> I say I'd want some "indication that such a change could be upstreamed,"
>> I mean more specifically that someone would be willing to shepherd the
>> process of getting the code into shape.
>>
>
> I think it depends on your definition of shepherd. If it means review
> your patches and tell you what needs to be done, then we can probably
> handle that. Things tend to stall if the patch proposer loses interest
> after the first review, so we're pretty far from "fire and forget".
>
> I'd like to hear one or two more opinions from regular contributors
> before I say "yes, this is something we want to do."

FYI everyone, message modification times has been proposed before [1].

BR,
Jani.


[1] id:1323796305-28789-1-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net
http://mid.gmane.org/1323796305-28789-1-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net