Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3DF431FC3 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:52:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7gW8-CApAxc5 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:51:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DD23431FAF for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:51:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xt9yU-0004Zz-27; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 02:51:46 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 13008 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 06:51:40 -0000 From: David Bremner To: David Edmondson , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v1] emacs: Replace `notmuch-search-result-format' evaluation. In-Reply-To: <1416825869-28472-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> References: <1416825869-28472-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+2~g32855b9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 07:51:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87ppcbdb7n.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 06:52:01 -0000 David Edmondson writes: > Alternative implementation of code that interprets > `notmuch-search-result-format' to insert the results of a search. > --- > > First pass at this. Thoughts? The general direction looks very nice. > +A symbol corresponding to an attribute of the > + thread (e.g. `:date_relative' or `:subject'). It'd be nice for the user to have a pointer here to figure out what the possible attributes are.