Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FBBD429E38 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 15:24:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YYN5v43DIA9o for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 15:24:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from jameswestby.net (jameswestby.net [89.145.97.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB3FD429E34 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 15:24:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [74.220.184.116] (helo=dim.jameswestby.net) by jameswestby.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWcSp-0008L2-Pk; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:24:20 +0000 Received: by dim.jameswestby.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D80EF5A1D48; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 18:24:18 -0500 (EST) From: James Westby To: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>, Sebastian Spaeth , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] python: add classes to wrap all notmuch_*_t types In-Reply-To: <87y5uvnjgs.fsf@jameswestby.net> References: <1318198374-926-1-git-send-email-4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> <87vcr39e9q.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87ty5kugq2.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87hb1jc1gx.fsf@jameswestby.net> <87y5uvnjgs.fsf@jameswestby.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6.1-1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 18:24:18 -0500 Message-ID: <878vmuk15p.fsf@jameswestby.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:24:22 -0000 On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:20:35 -0500, James Westby wrote: > I'll test again to make sure that I have this correct, but my tests > yesterday certainly suggested that your patches fixed this. Yep, segfaults a plenty dropping your second patch that go away again when it is applied once more. Thanks, James