Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4D96DE02B1 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:20:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.715 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.715 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.285, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jDmQQ1M3Qmf9 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:20:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2E176DE1B48 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:19:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wicgi11 with SMTP id gi11so21888963wic.0 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:19:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=448VD6vbqyxFTPDeXdCDFRqBr8r+Zanagq+k8DarHUM=; b=FK2eBoJMkrMdVZtd6iO9rModejQeooRcSkTS/9pkWZEreZ05cM4KpuN597InORrXrH 3EJj66Z/iNpzxfOMyTv60KfIcNFKu+gOkYS5rMXWq6LQIC7e4WGAfAX2aYPkcS7sLbp/ 9NXbj+0AUXMOsPvsKC6yx+vKPfNJD8Cm5pWcyxp50MOxtAOswkRKnulnKuNb9HsIXgEj Xmrjb4bYpczu0WgXu5hOTjHe8oyUmx+QZ3CV5Gha+LFTPwhTg4bNv4a7hidx2KrcalkU lNRnguFyTZlIVvDBXtywd99no7hHHGs+qrMNkfAXImj9DnbgeSmXwxOwUDNY3vArOhfA 8WGg== X-Received: by 10.194.121.163 with SMTP id ll3mr50956353wjb.142.1435076343619; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:19:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (5751dfa2.skybroadband.com. [87.81.223.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a6sm3412244wjy.33.2015.06.23.09.19.02 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:19:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Walters To: David Bremner , notmuch Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?=5BRa=C3=BAl?= Benencia] Bug#789693: notmuch-emacs: notmuch-tree does not mark messages as read In-Reply-To: <87616ewk86.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> References: <87616ewk86.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+86~gef5e66a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:19:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87pp4mwg7e.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:20:37 -0000 Hi > This seems to be true for me also. Strange that I never noticed before. > Am I right in thinking that patch > > id:1433843467-32398-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com > > is directed to fix this? Yes that is correct. What happened is that the tree code relied on the message-pane (a show buffer) to mark the message read, but updated its own display. After the unread handling changes the show buffer only marks a message read if it is the active buffer (so its post-command hook gets called), so it no longer removes the unread tag. Best wishes Mark (PS this message shows the deficiencies in our emacs reply handling: it doesn't include the rfc822 part!)