Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6022C431FB5
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 02:40:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]
	autolearn=unavailable
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 2H9cYBwF89B7 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Wed, 24 Nov 2010 02:40:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com
	[74.125.82.181])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A8C431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 02:40:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wyf22 with SMTP id 22so39948wyf.26
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 02:40:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.137.17 with SMTP id u17mr9055969wbt.129.1290595241848;
	Wed, 24 Nov 2010 02:40:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ut.hh.sledj.net (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com
	[81.149.164.25])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x65sm3369512weq.1.2010.11.24.02.40.39
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
	Wed, 24 Nov 2010 02:40:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ut.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 86A7C594058; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:36:51 +0000 (GMT)
To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>,
	notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: Inconsistent output from "notmuch search --output=<foo>"
In-Reply-To: <87fwurjeuh.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
References: <871v6b79s0.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87fwurjeuh.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-14-g06ba2c7 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:36:46 +0000
Message-ID: <87vd3n6m9t.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:40:45 -0000

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:38:46 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>=
 wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:09:03 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> > The inconsistency is the presence of the "thread:" and "id:" prefixes in
> > the first two cases, (note that there isn't any "tag:" prefix in the
> > last case). I can't find any good justification for these.
>=20
> I use the output of notmuch search --format=3Dthreads to feed to another
> notmuch tag operation, and if the thread: prefix vanishes, I'll have to f=
ind other
> ways to do that. :)

You can trivially insert the 'thread:' prefix if it gets removed.

dme.
=2D-=20
David Edmondson, http://dme.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkzs6r8ACgkQaezQq/BJZRaKVQCeLJWQK2sLAauyVPy4pSxaUy6x
hZoAoIS0gfTItILiWD8mYyymV7kmdLv2
=evoG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--