Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093E5429E5B for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:29:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.789 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BMKDAXa1CPXy for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ADFD429E55 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wyh22 with SMTP id 22so690140wyh.26 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:29:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=hZkzbvhxZyR3IVdJPSe9OcywO8L0NE0VeVZxQ+abTgs=; b=PTRVQTVHwii+VSZ3Y0IJLYPy2l3+4QX0EXMdSQDBgSqeY+amFvydV5a0d6roODPcxo LhQiMPAvhEJFU+CIZcx9zgjuOoBB/SthgRtjzUjDRBquWJnruiawsqMZ3i2O2gHfbrMX w4kXAu703ci8KMDXQL/d0jJgPXNhHdWIFqW6I= Received: by 10.216.231.165 with SMTP id l37mr319730weq.78.1309328991756; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:29:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (pc-88068.lal.in2p3.fr [134.158.88.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d7sm460073wek.21.2011.06.28.23.29.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:29:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Sebastien Binet To: Dmitry Kurochkin , Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: bug in emacs-ui ? In-Reply-To: <87tyb9wggu.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8739j5rn2d.fsf@cern.ch> <87pqm8cz4f.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <87oc1spkkc.fsf@cern.ch> <87mxhccw9v.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <87hb7kpi7e.fsf@cern.ch> <87fwn4cm9q.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <87hb7jg2rl.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <878vsv9eam.fsf@cern.ch> <87oc1qet0v.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87ei2m8imo.fsf@cern.ch> <87pqm6f059.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87y60lyhyu.fsf@gmail.com> <87tyb9wggu.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/ (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:29:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87tyb95eww.fsf@cern.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 06:29:54 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dmitry, On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:53:37 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:38:17 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > > Hi Jani. > >=20 > > On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:35:48 +0000 (UTC), Jani Nikula = wrote: > > > Carl Worth writes: > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:50:23 +0200, Sebastien Binet > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:09:20 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > > > > > Perhaps this is an emacs bug? > > > > > could be, but, > > > > >=20 > > > > > > I'm using Debian's emacs 23.3.1 and have not encountered the pr= oblem > > > > > > described. > > > > > I don't see anything related to 'point', 'point-invisible-p' nor > > > 'forward-char' in there: > > > > > http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/emacs23/23.3+1-1 > > > >=20 > > > > Perhaps I was confused. I thought 23.3.1 was a distinct upstream re= lease > > > > From 23.3, but maybe not, (emacs version numbers use 1-based indexi= ng > > > > perhaps?). > > > >=20 > > > > > anyways... for the moment I'll just live with it... > > > >=20 > > > > Sorry about that. > > > >=20 > > > > > except if somebody has some insights on how to "catch" the 'End of > > > > > buffer' error and add some more protective programming around the > > > > > 'scroll-up' function ? > > > >=20 > > > > My emacs lisp skills are primarily restricted to actual > > > > experimentation. So if I can replicate the bug, I might be able to = find > > > > a fix. I'm not very good at doing theoretical fixes with emacs lisp > > > > code. > > >=20 > > > I bisected the problem to commit 95ef8da29439f2e79115c36ab4d2a80aef1a= 1462 ("Fix > > > hiding a message while some citations are shown in notmuch-show view"= ). > > > Reverting that fixes the problem for me. (If you don't want to resolve > > > conflicts, also revert 432e091924c1d1d8950a44ca78bc5b9c5ade47e4 first= .) I don't > > > have the time just now to try to figure out the problem in that, but = perhaps > > > this will help others go forward. > > >=20 > >=20 > > Thanks for tracking this. I will look into it. > >=20 >=20 > I have posted a patch to fix this bug [1]. thanks a lot for figuring this one out. I'll give it a try! =2Ds --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4Kxj8ACgkQPj4AVbsZCCZ/gQCfckhA33W+YHfjrax1kn5XXa3/ u2QAn2elrnKqaZXQPkamt6Y/i6xZMq0e =v68p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--