Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB596DE0B29 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:04:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.82 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iJJvMhxB_-Sq for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-f194.google.com (mail-wi0-f194.google.com [209.85.212.194]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 151BF6DE0948 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wivz2 with SMTP id z2so7200763wiv.0 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:04:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=+8UXRgfJXcmedVy297djsB4jzKpief0ak7qD+gn4w7E=; b=x2qGna+1Rbzi8j+BTdxi1IENMq/7/IyFPfv0bw6bCjugHGJ3BUhk6QkpFkthGnVoOc gKecUUMTh13qHT7E02x5qiAq5uG+Y1qKvImEUFKdG1PSLHrjFH2TB65G12GBcdpywQxi FCf6NbMIpuPpenW59qjXcYzqRRcP4y7ZFll+tScTlFnSpBpw6X7tIOgG4PM00w6lecqi 8b6YrYVnJ38KMsfnSDycdvxImRf3WupUHLeexwI9BBUXGHNv/B/v1PtB4VRnW00ZuVok 1aZrJVKNLU3x8TVl0ePcLFjpA6E/u8BnH6FL2sEv3qSA3qVoe8LlmApAi4kpbtrh7MjE +tVw== X-Received: by 10.180.75.48 with SMTP id z16mr333287wiv.49.1434056657793; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:04:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chitra.no-ip.org (tunnel.sorglosinternet.de. [46.165.228.69]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q2sm2779872wjz.15.2015.06.11.14.04.16 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Suvayu Ali Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 23:04:15 +0200 From: Suvayu Ali To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Understanding the "replied" tag Message-ID: <20150611210415.GI13111@chitra.no-ip.org> Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:04:22 -0000 On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 01:25:44PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote: > > I would really like to know if a message has been replied to (e.g. > using a certain message id). It seems that all I need to do is check > for the "replied" tag. But often this tag is not there, even when > there has been a reply (I have confirmed this through the thread > display and checking the message that replied to the message to make > sure it indeed has header "replied-to:"). You do not give enough details, but I would guess you are probably reading and replying emails from real maildirs in mutt-kz. The synchronising of notmuch tags and maildir flags happen correctly only when you read and reply from virtual folders. Of course they are synchronised again when `notmuch new' is run the next time. But until such time, the tags and flags will not be in sync, if you are using real folders instead of virtual folders. Hope this helps, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.