Return-Path: <xma@gnu.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3330431FAF
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:58:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.463
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id VK+ZRfvZAMJa for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:58:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net
	[88.164.105.66])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934B3431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:58:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1])
	by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33F32160D
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:58:17 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to
	:subject:reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=
	postfix; bh=DMmON/k157ZPMUTlhfVtc4zcwqc=; b=V7+WNcfh/Lp0XcFLQkAi
	Bp39FacYnw2surLnGhmhLagNtZ8HTZsaUqtQZ+tDPtSEsjVF/Y0304UvbWfVsHCc
	/gjQtYI5h7KZRiqQp828QaYGKtzLF1xHW4eiN9PKIl6doqAjCqwmkFMHNqElGDR8
	kB1qeeWOUvkECV6Tlt7wAqc=
Received: from maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net
	[88.164.105.66])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:58:17 +0100 (CET)
From: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Sort by newest first from notmuch-hello ?
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
	(i486-slackware-linux-gnu)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:15:42 +0100
Message-ID: <m2obu04n6p.fsf@kcals.intra.maillard.im>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:58:22 -0000

Hi,

I am running latest release (0.11).
I have set notmuch-search-oldest-first to t. When doing M-x
notmuch-search, messages order does not respect this setting -i.e newest
com firts -. On the other hand, from notmuch-hello I get expected
behaviour.

How can this be more "consistent" ?

By the way, am I alone having hundreds thousand messages ? If not, what
would you thing setting this variable to `nil' by default ? Having first
messages at the top would be more usefull that scrolling down really far
;-)

Regards

/Xavier