Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05649431FBC for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:57:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SWGCe+42mYtq for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:57:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0B3431FAE for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:57:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcagg.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.66]) by mx.perfora.net (node=mxus0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M4pHR-1NmFDU0oTF-00zOBs for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:57:33 -0500 Received: from _HOSTNAME_ (unknown [84.55.215.119]) by homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9290C250069 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:57:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:11:18 +0100 Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:11:18 +0100 From: To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Message-Id: <20100116095730.9290C250069@homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:31:28 -0800 Subject: Re: [notmuch] Thoughts on notmuch and Lua X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:57:35 -0000 > We've talked about switching from default tags of "inbox" and "unread" > to simply having new mail tagged with a "new" tag. Ohh, please make the standard set of tags for new mail configurable in the config file. I might want to add different tags for special purposes, like "not_virus_scanned_yet" or what not by default. Having to run a script just to add those tags to any "new" mails sounds a bit complicated and error-prone to me. spaetz