Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37833431FD0 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 13:33:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40pQiZvq1G8z for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 13:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.43.72.2]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EE3431FB6 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 13:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C64A29A057; Tue, 24 May 2011 13:33:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 807DD25417E; Tue, 24 May 2011 13:33:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Stewart Smith , notmuch Subject: Re: [BUG] [PATCH] Fix appending of Received headers In-Reply-To: <878vu6ulev.fsf@flamingspork.com> References: <878vu6ulev.fsf@flamingspork.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 13:33:25 -0700 Message-ID: <87ipszltyi.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 20:33:36 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 17 May 2011 12:10:32 +1000, Stewart Smith wrote: > We're not properly concatenating the Received headers if we parse them > while requesting a header that isn't Received. Thanks, Stewart. The fix looks clearly correct. > this fixes notmuch-reply address detection in a bunch of situations. But can we go one step beyond "a bunch of situations"? Could you send a message that demonstrates this bug? Or better yet, extend the test/from-guessing test case to expose the bug? I'd prefer to fix the test suite here so that we don't later regress on this behavior. Thanks, =2DCarl =2D-=20 carl.d.worth@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEUEARECAAYFAk3cFhUACgkQ6JDdNq8qSWil4QCYsjOSQFECSvKGL+1KHSWEjG0w IACfb5xVO2WiiqM1wKs7/sbviy0DjHQ= =9pHV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--