Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2473A6DE0275 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:30:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.489 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.255, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OjEi2ZN-UQqm for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DAFF6DE0140 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:30:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUl4o-0000KV-UW; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:29:58 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 14714 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:29:38 -0000 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cli/lib: remove support for GMime 2.4 In-Reply-To: <1439739201-11068-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> References: <1439739201-11068-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+60~gcb08a2e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 21:29:38 -0300 Message-ID: <87bndtvaj1.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:30:34 -0000 David Bremner writes: > It's becoming a maintenance burden to do anything things with the > crypto glue code twice, once for 2.4 and once for 2.6. I don't have > any 2.4 version available to test on my development machine anymore, > so the 2.4 specific code paths are likely not very well tested. I have pushed this change, along with a minimal note in NEWS d