From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>, martin f krafft
	<madduck@madduck.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: <87eil1bqk2.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
References: <87my083mgh.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87d4148s2c.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net>
	<4B595D3A.1030901@SSpaeth.de> <87636u34lw.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
	<87d411zvz8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<20100125213231.GB15987@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
	<87ock5punt.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<87eil1bqk2.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:13:54 -0800
Message-ID: <87mxyywiod.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Subject: Re: [notmuch] Git feature branch
Precedence: list

--=-=-=

On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:58:05 -0500, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> Once the project becomes more mature and other developers are
> vetting patches, then their branches can take over as "master" in the
> absence of an outdated canonical master.

The other thing that will happen as the project matures is that I expect
to start merging other people's carefully vetted and reviewed
branches. This will happen as people start to take ownership of
particular code areas and we establish mutual trust on taste, code
review, testing, etc.

I think that will be the real solution for future bottlenecks when I'm
not available for much patch review due to travel, sickness,
hectic-life-in-general, etc.

-Carl

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLhXpy6JDdNq8qSWgRAvCWAJ0Zg+KD1CGFYg6jQreo4nB5eZj78QCgpPY9
ldxfabn7DDnPW0oooxF1aMU=
=uyme
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--