Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562D5431FBF for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 07:33:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.682 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.682 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.683, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iw1YlCh5dkd6 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 07:33:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from homiemail-a11.g.dreamhost.com (mailbigip.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.5]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84AF431FAE for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 07:33:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from sspaeth.de (vpn-global-dhcp2-98.ethz.ch [129.132.209.98]) by homiemail-a11.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CA5B419406D; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 07:32:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:32:52 +0100 From: "Sebastian Spaeth" To: Jesse Rosenthal , notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <87pr3iygrx.fsf@jhu.edu> References: <87pr3iygrx.fsf@jhu.edu> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:32:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87fx4eain0.fsf@SSpaeth.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:33:09 -0000 On 2010-03-05, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > By the way, the reason that I didn't submit this as a patch to > notmuch.el is that I'm not sure how we want to deal with things that are > actually more about message-mode, and could possibly affect other > programs using message-mode (gnus). This is really neat functionality, and I have no problems with hooking this into message mode directly (or even including it into notmuch). I think it is reasonable to tag notmuch messages as replied (even when doing from gnus) when I have loaded (notmuch.el). Testing 'replied' tag with this message... > There are a couple of ways to deal > with this (e.g., notmuch minor-mode in message-mode, custom headers) but > my sense is that we should keep notmuch.el from being too imperious at > the moment. ;-). I agree. Sebastian