DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
	b=QUSZucN/nqn97hJIDMM3sh8FhLe7WiSFpLyA60aEu1881nvpV8jqXuSL9A5bn3ZFgj
	HK/s6Qp6B+5J78r3geP8WAObY3tmqkyD5JmFMzYX7KnnFwdJ/VTiGmjPs1pN+ND2Aoic
	EYAmKKGAVVlcvy8Bw4eWqXXub3ubb8Oka3LDk=
From: Daniel Schoepe <daniel.schoepe@googlemail.com>
To: Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Make the queries used in the all-tags section
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=729DWai4q57iBSfz1wDhBXsmndQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87fwoath2s.fsf@gilead.home.box>
	<BANLkTinKS5LbQsZuK8HyCzj+Lo4xqa2Sfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<871uznqeox.fsf@tredergarh.home.box>
	<BANLkTin0+O=mubHF7JNpw4u3DQDQJQ5zbw@mail.gmail.com>
	<874o4iwwp5.fsf@gilead.invalid> <871uzmwtng.fsf@gilead.invalid>
	<BANLkTikAB0mogUuS-nT_-i51LBdUBHCz3g@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ei3mcw7h.fsf@gilead.invalid>
	<BANLkTi=729DWai4q57iBSfz1wDhBXsmndQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-210-g1acc997 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 01:21:17 +0200
Message-ID: <87aaeacqoi.fsf@gilead.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

On Wed, 25 May 2011 18:42:30 -0400, Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu> wrote:
> 'Doh.  That's what I get for not reading the surrounding code.  I
> misunderstood what your patch was going for and assumed it was what
> *I* wanted notmuch to do, which is to show me useful counts (e.g.,
> unread count), but not to change the underlying query.  ]:--8)

I thought about that too, but figured it should be rather rare that
someone wants only a portion of some messages _counted_, but all
displayed when clicking on the search next to the count.

I'm somewhat indifferent, since I rarely use those links
directly, so any more opinions on this are very much appreciated.

> So, to me, it seems like this turns the all tags section into another
> saved searches section, just with a slight twist, and makes me wonder
> if there's a better way to reconcile these.

Well, it already was sort of a non-configurable saved searches section
before, so I didn't really turn it into one. :)

Since the main difference between those sections is the clear visual
distinction, it might be an option to provide the user with functions to
easily declare new sections for the hello screen, where this sort of
thing is configurable. (One possible use that comes to mind would be to
group tags into different categories.)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=lCqk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--