Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60336DE0AC2 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 09:11:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.008 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pb-IFvouXweq for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 09:11:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (mail-wm0-f68.google.com [74.125.82.68]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2576F6DE02CE for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 09:11:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id 128so16380544wmz.3 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 09:11:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=mg+EgrME11VliK1Uu4uvJL4Buu/RWT55NhHmeQoY6lQ=; b=G8IEe5SRJ1B0KPFuPCNxCFcxtVQ+xVcpjsEIF0Uw+eQchJIpSmZ7F5y0XuTIpNBh4w NGhRklYgUnpG55AOqYGQJ8QyShfioo9/XsVYQHbXY0OC9aUpgcOJs7LcLkOL1oW5MCb3 K1u0g48+jGJN0/UaWKdjm1xWFtV6eZBhbb6GILQ5Rw4hE8lqKpGB+G6qe8LZxVmmkuPT JKI9rNOS0dJw0+zvLH9k1O3db1/oeobl2Jj33fHolOrZyevimYlXjULWCQnofBvWEweN GYTHklFYgKy4KpcJZBs72DE7yvnjGCKqcoYeJcz/Lmu/mxkc4kPZZXXyFdLlnioxxt5/ ik4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=mg+EgrME11VliK1Uu4uvJL4Buu/RWT55NhHmeQoY6lQ=; b=SycIwcb8zo6JuQ0SkJaiflg5RYtL23BKyFjXzC5XqbEppNq0dSmw0CZiZY9vRBHc2R Ic2YKPWMcwRmgfnWVHUncm97XyNCDKCaLRU5az28gz4iF6+lgfVlQPaJJvthzZtTuzWd WooDDAwjFuzLBeUuR4/1cCqWK65om9IwZrhicZ8U5Q2+R9Fs4cJ07ObX1NCyXNYnUn8V sj5QrX6M+rYXaZoh7j9Lvrssxn0K7LpWUIr7kNmIXXWxj9NhKv3WtelhycOdxCoQ+ATJ UXH85VUvPYGKQgmM6uOzcjKKSu5mNBermz8C+5XYjFh6acXq48lpFlig4DPQa+W11ICR 5Qmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOS9T8qMZPROzJVqs/gyoWSUV2TUnQoT2Mp3M9e3GikUeNERxaPqYjYID9gIVGKo9w== X-Received: by 10.194.95.40 with SMTP id dh8mr3719625wjb.94.1454951499464; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 09:11:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net ([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x6sm30698723wje.38.2016.02.08.09.11.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Feb 2016 09:11:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net [local]) by disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 2be1cf46; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:11:36 +0000 (UTC) To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] emacs: Improve the cited message included in replies In-Reply-To: <1446894276-7814-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> References: <1446894276-7814-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> From: David Edmondson Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 17:11:36 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 17:11:45 -0000 On Sat, Nov 07 2015, Mark Walters wrote: > This is a rebase and somewhat tweaked version of dme's series from last year > id:1399897769-26809-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org I'm a bad person to review these changes, having written some of them. Could someone else take a look? > One particular motivation for this series is that it fixes a long > standing bug we have that replying to a message with an rfc822 part > completely omits that part. It also fixes the bug whereby we don't > include application/octet-stream parts which are actually text/plain > (and thus are displayed in show mode). > > This series makes the reply code use the same code as the show code so > everything works as expected: the reply buffer looks essentially the > same as the show buffer. > > There is one slight difference: the user might want different part > headers displayed when replying; both because the audience is > different (a non-notmuch using recipient) and because the buttons > don't "work" (you can't click on them to show or view a part). > > Dme and I disagree on which of these we would like to see so make that > customisable. > > The key change is patch 3 which switches how reply works. Also note > that patch 2 is almost all whitespace change as the changes modify the > indentation. > > Best wishes > > Mark > > > David Edmondson (6): > emacs/show: Re-arrange determination if a part header is necessary > emacs/show: Accommodate the lack of part header buttons > emacs/mua: Generate improved cited text for replies > emacs/show: Remove the 'no-buttons option of > `notmuch-show-insert-bodypart' > emacs/show: Make the insertion of part headers overridable. > emacs/mua: Let user specify which parts get a header in citations. > > Mark Walters (1): > test: fix the tests for the new reply code > > emacs/notmuch-mua.el | 60 ++++++++++----------- > emacs/notmuch-show.el | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > test/T310-emacs.sh | 32 ++++++++++++ > test/test-lib.el | 4 ++ > 4 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.1.4 > > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch