Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B96D431FD0 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:13:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9d2oBC3IFtj4 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-f42.google.com (mail-la0-f42.google.com [209.85.215.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93C5C431FC3 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id ea20so4238283lab.15 for ; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 07:13:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=R4pA1gj+BPkoPnNIl4RfrlJZrWbUvd79x6AfEc8Jirk=; b=z3Ga6aRcItd770XIcYuUK9MWG05DrTPbCs/njzIHe+OmfAz4Jp/AuoF+bTJGUjBdXP nwuny5SotmkO6AgCkVkMt47f+QGeW4bIB7BCzMGL2GnepoeTzh5t8Cd8CvMEO07IRoKo z0zQaku+mp+rraueBWMJqYwqCBtDkpFJk7+lYZF3FaOy3fIg8KIxFLAgjs9ECWDyvHoT UujgCpb+coYg0rCUKfDpWXjFk5Y4janSpxXC5XepSgVjlg5Xjy4SOQt3prJOZe8iUT6z r+mqUeaDh9LKJdypAhvjMggNGDg2lKT0GkB8di7H23koGeyFZpG/eQluHCx5rv8wNmwZ aBog== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.45.42 with SMTP id j10mr5067931lam.15.1383401183622; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 07:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.201.69 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:06:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zjpmoqtz.fsf@nikula.org> References: <5274f93e254b5_6de7f51e7849@nysa.notmuch> <87zjpmoqtz.fsf@nikula.org> Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 08:06:23 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Getting the right root mail of the thread From: Felipe Contreras To: Jani Nikula Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "notmuch@notmuchmail.org" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 14:13:09 -0000 On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> I think there should be a way to get the root mail of a thread, >> irrespective of the search order. > > Largely agreed. It's just that nobody's gotten around to doing this > yet. At the cli level I think the consensus is that the structured > (sexp/json) output format should contain multiple (or all) subjects. What about the default? (--format=text). What about user-interfaces that must display a summary of a thread? -- Felipe Contreras