MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87wqs4rsjm.fsf@zancas.localnet>
References: <1365031678-25188-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
	<87y5clte1j.fsf@zancas.localnet>
	<CAMP44s07KeL4uAChs3KFiqwcsCwWTvni6MzFGzXNeO7=sd6U6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<87wqs4rsjm.fsf@zancas.localnet>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:13:17 -0500
Message-ID:
 <CAMP44s2RuAGjJV089swpjwG9i5X=sARPYve6XZPyK7X7QwZBDg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian: package ruby bindings
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:34 AM, David Bremner <bremner@debian.org> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>>> On a related note, is the ruby build
>>> procedure documented somewhere?
>>
>> Not really, it's just standard.
>>
>
> OK, but that doesn't really help us deal with support requests e.g. on IRC.
> Some "feature requests" for the bindings:

Can you point to some of these requests, or are they hypothetical?
Moreover, wouldn't making sure that the bindings are package mostly
solve this issue?

> 1. Add a short README describing how to build, and how to read the docs
> (it looks like there is a public)
>
> 2. Add a couple tests at least reaching the (low) bar set by the python
>    bindings
>
> 3. Build and install the docs locally as part of the (in-progress)
> debian package

That would be good, but it's out of scope for this patch.

-- 
Felipe Contreras