Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF52431FDD for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 09:58:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.438 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8JW+IuVhKNcV for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 09:58:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from tuna.imca.aps.anl.gov (tuna.imca.aps.anl.gov [164.54.200.33]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F23431FDA for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 09:58:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mink.imca.aps.anl.gov (seal.imca.aps.anl.gov [164.54.200.39]) by tuna.imca.aps.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9522005F for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:50:40 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <54EB686F.5070802@imca-cat.org> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:50:39 -0600 From: "J. Lewis Muir" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: BUG: bad notmuch shared library install_name on Mac OS X References: <54089FBC.20404@imca-cat.org> <87wq9jtawy.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <20140905124705.GA9173@bass.imca.aps.anl.gov> In-Reply-To: <20140905124705.GA9173@bass.imca.aps.anl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:58:59 -0000 On 9/5/14 7:47 AM, J. Lewis Muir wrote: > On 9/4/14, 2:58 PM, David Bremner wrote: >> "J. Lewis Muir" writes: >> >>> Hello. >>> >>> I submitted a patch [1] to fix a bug in how the notmuch shared >>> library is built on Mac OS X, but perhaps it's not clear it fixes a >>> bug, so I wanted to just request it be tagged as a bug for nmbug. >> >> Done, at least twice (waves to Jani). > > Hi, David. > > Great! Thanks! > >> The usual problem we have with OS/X patches is finding somebody to >> review them. > > OK. I guess I can't help there, but the commit message does give > short instructions for how to reproduce the problem, so hopefully > someone will be able to review it. Hello, Notmuchers! I'm just following up on this bug report; has anyone had a chance to review it? Is there anything I can do to help it along? My initial email to the list is archived at http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2014/018956.html That email includes easy-to-follow instructions for how to reproduce the problem. And the follow-up thread to which I'm replying is archived at http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2014/018984.html Thank you! Lewis