Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EEF6DE0130 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:29:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.012 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g6fPLpTcXqSy for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:29:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E6866DE00DA for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:29:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1b9yL9-000245-Oa; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 13:29:27 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 1035 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 06 Jun 2016 17:29:36 -0000 From: David Bremner To: sfischme@uwaterloo.ca, Gaute Hope , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Cc: Austin Clements Subject: Re: searching: '*analysis' vs 'reanalysis' In-Reply-To: <877fe2tiy8.fsf@uwaterloo.ca> References: <1465196150-astroid-3-33kf2otxir-16915@strange> <87lh2ijxor.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca> <1465217156-astroid-4-8l08w9cils-2318@strange> <877fe2tiy8.fsf@uwaterloo.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22+28~gb9bf3f4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:29:36 -0300 Message-ID: <878tyins3j.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 17:29:52 -0000 Sebastian Fischmeister writes: > > I ran into this problem before as well. Storage is cheap. Notmuch could > index all emails with reversed text to get around some of this > problem. It doesn't solve the problem of *analysis*, but it's still an > improvement. It would probably be more useful to have brute force regexp searches on headers. Austin did some experiments that sounded promising, where you basically postprocess the result of a xapian query with a regexp. OTOH, I don't know what kept him from proposing this for mainline. If it was just parser issues, those are probably more or less solved now, at least for people using xapian 1.3+ d