Return-Path: <djcb.bulk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397D9431FBC
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:14:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id WUA+Cq2rRtUR for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:14:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.153])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78136431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:14:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so835389fgg.2
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:14:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=F4bu6hj39pAsk/BPcqCwtvifSyjo71NnFTrn7+by2xo=;
	b=M2TYb+CLRiugdXizrgqiIWjF1m5Sw2SksS1j9HIVvAxReJ2ferqIY7UYsLOMOtSJai
	ufD0TS3bDEm3fXLqNEW4pDHD89uK09OU0opyZjsFTxcpi/W51YlwrzEYs7f3qqUfsTvW
	d9mKR9w9GG1W2w/Jv5h0prkpt6BoSEKX142m4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=Lb/a6AJpRpgN9xrOMR69ms0YlEXOYBgtUjdNOSyZGIZko7l8UAwtaMvQLoMg/sVWOO
	caflHYpJXBpuDkkxphRjELcd5x3XyRBRYccfCsfIaFJMM+Ox8j3HhLkzBkrKGY01mgbl
	GUHwjspEffjn5wAs/IJKaPvKxJBW3fVdUi/ok=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.87.76.8 with SMTP id d8mr4271600fgl.66.1258992852579; Mon, 23 
	Nov 2009 08:14:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87ws1h48up.fsf@59A2.org>
References: <87skc5yd6v.wl%djcb@djcbsoftware.nl>
	<b8197bcb0911222334v26e96890t3632369ff32ff80f@mail.gmail.com>
	<1873022c0911230311o77e55fdqa5464a2dd16ec265@mail.gmail.com>
	<b8197bcb0911230519l4edf1b72w26d993834f25a417@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ws1h48up.fsf@59A2.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:14:12 +0200
Message-ID: <1873022c0911230814y783f14ffn23f12d13c73e5acc@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dirk-Jan Binnema <djcb.bulk@gmail.com>
To: Jed Brown <jed@59a2.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f8d182c0b5fc04790c1d94
Cc: "notmuch@notmuchmail org" <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>, djcb@djcbsoftware.nl
Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 1/2] * avoid gcc 4.4.1 compiler warnings due
	to ignored write return values
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:14:14 -0000

--001485f8d182c0b5fc04790c1d94
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Jed,

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Jed Brown <jed@59a2.org> wrote:

>
>
> But I'm confused here because I don't currently see any warnings with
> gcc-4.4.2.  Actually this must be a bug because I get no warnings for
> the blatantly unused
>
>  malloc(5);
>

Did you try it with -O2? Without optimizations many of the warnings are not
issued.

Best wishes,
Dirk.

--001485f8d182c0b5fc04790c1d94
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Jed,<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:24 PM, =
Jed Brown <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jed@59a2.org">jed@59a2.or=
g</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"borde=
r-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-le=
ft: 1ex;">
<br>
<br>
But I&#39;m confused here because I don&#39;t currently see any warnings wi=
th<br>
gcc-4.4.2. =A0Actually this must be a bug because I get no warnings for<br>
the blatantly unused<br>
<br>
 =A0malloc(5);<br></blockquote><div><br>Did you try it with -O2? Without op=
timizations many of the warnings are not issued.<br><br>Best wishes,<br>Dir=
k.<br></div></div>

--001485f8d182c0b5fc04790c1d94--