Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0251431FAF for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:33:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0PtiMZt5FDNl for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7D3431FAE for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix, from userid 501) id E19DB100372; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:33:23 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Bremner , Jakub Wilk , 683505@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#683505: notmuch: FTBFS if built twice in a row: unrepresentable changes to source In-Reply-To: <87pq7aabl8.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> References: <20120801103707.GA668@jwilk.net> <87pq7aabl8.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+103~g9610d35 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:33:17 -0000 On Wed, Aug 01 2012, David Bremner wrote: > Jakub Wilk writes: > >> | dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to test/tmp.json/mail/.notmuch/xapian/record.baseB: binary file contents changed >> | dpkg-source: error: add test/tmp.json/mail/.notmuch/xapian/record.baseB in debian/source/include-binaries if you want to store the modified binary in the debian tarball >> -- >> Jakub Wilk > > I guess the problem here is that the notmuch build process does not > clean up the test directories in case of failing tests. I guess it > probably should if the user explicitly runs "make clean". > > Any thoughts on that notmuch people? Should we add a list of test/tmp.* > to be cleaned? yes. > > d Tomi