From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Better handling of stdout and stderr
In-Reply-To: <87k4kkq3r2.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
References: <1289346035-24904-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
	<87k4kkq3r2.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
	(i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:25:49 -0800
Message-ID: <8739r8bt9u.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:15:45 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
> Meanwhile, I've just now pushed out my little test-lib.sh change, so you
> can update the patch for that as well.

Oh, and one other thing I forgot to mention about the patch. It
currently talks about things along the lines of "git-style tests" and
"cworth-style tests".

You and I might understand perfectly well what that means now, but we
need the test suite to be independently comprehensible. (I'd like to be
able to understand it myself when I look at it again in the future,
having forgotten the current history.)

So if you could describe these instead as something like "tests using
test_expect_success" vs. "tests using
test_begin_subtest/test_expect_equal" or something like that, that would
be great.

Thanks again,

=2DCarl

=2D-=20
carl.d.worth@intel.com

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFM2zgN6JDdNq8qSWgRAqboAKClMPpBilMUI8oZv3CrmDYzy+sZjQCfTx/u
6S4I6bqx2W+/kzN5zT8YlIo=
=rnXq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--