Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529A46DE140C for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 08:15:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.663 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5YKtDOeL1XKt for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 08:15:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52D26DE0C66 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 08:15:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A0C100080; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 18:16:02 +0200 (EET) From: Tomi Ollila To: Erik Quaeghebeur , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Message-ID's vs. Resent-Message-ID In-Reply-To: <2154153.mZhPRoAGrk@sysoppad> References: <2154153.mZhPRoAGrk@sysoppad> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+32~g73439f8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:15:54 -0000 On Sun, Jan 10 2016, Erik Quaeghebeur wrote: > Hi, > > > I've become interested in notmuch. After looking at the documentation of > the Python bindings, I have the following questions: > * Is it correct that a message's Message-ID used as its unique key in the > notmuch database? yes > * If yes, is it correct that two messages with the same Message-ID, but > with different contents/other headers, will have only one entry in the > database? yes > * If yes, for resent messages > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.6.6), does notmuch use > (the chronologically last) Resent-Message-ID, or the Message-ID? the Message-ID > > > Best, likewise :) > > Erik Tomi