Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1707A421197 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 04:37:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.207 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[MISSING_HEADERS=1.207] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l+4WtUcv86CX for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 04:37:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gw3.nixu.fi (mail-gw3.nixu.fi [193.209.237.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DF56421196 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 04:37:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (mail-gw3 [127.0.0.1]) by mail-gw3.nixu.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id q0DCbnZJ005372 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:37:49 +0200 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31]) by mail-gw3.nixu.fi with ESMTP id 114cs123x8-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:37:48 +0200 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31]) by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id q0DCbmdu011666 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:37:48 +0200 From: Tomi Ollila Cc: Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: globally replace non-branching "(if (not ..." with "(unless ..." In-Reply-To: References: <87vcogketu.fsf@praet.org> <1326389586-21683-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+176~g3f9d738 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.5.7110, 1.0.211, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-01-13_04:2012-01-13, 2012-01-13, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=5 spamscore=5 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1201130073 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:37:54 -0000 On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:42:55 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:23:55 +0000, David Edmondson wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:33:06 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > > > Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability. > > > > +1, but why not replace non-branching `if' with `when' as well? > > I tend to use WHEN for case I need to execute multiple > statements. For the rest, IF is ok. Same here, (when ...) is (if (progn ...)) for me. > > /Xavier Tomi