Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFE26DE0C1E for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 05:15:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.112 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.112 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.112] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id etwpv5qL3e04 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 05:15:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A39C06DE0B7C for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 05:15:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zf5PY-0006cU-9f; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:14:04 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 29080 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:13:43 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] make test: NOTMUCH_TEST_QUIET=1 is now the default In-Reply-To: References: <1442004251-32325-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> <87io75tji3.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+73~gd432116 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:13:43 -0300 Message-ID: <87wpvguia0.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:15:04 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: > > There was 2 primary motivations when I did that patch (which I forgot to > mark rfc although I thought doing so) 1) that was the fastest at the time > being and 2) the --verbose is already in use in test-lib.sh. > > First thing that come to my mind is that if (-v|--v[e[r[b[o[s[e]]]]]]) > option is for the suggested purpose its current behaviour is removed > and when the option is not give user is informed how to activate "verbose" > progress -- but as said that is just first thought... > > > Making NOTMUCH_TEST_QUIET no-op is probably no annoyance to anyone... > For the moment, I think this patch is good enough. Maybe we can make the interaction with --verbose make more sense in the future, but it's really an independant issue. d