Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520FE431FAF for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:58:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AiVLQSu6THQk for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ee0-f43.google.com (mail-ee0-f43.google.com [74.125.83.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA0DD431FAE for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:58:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ee0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e50so769153eek.16 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:58:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Tw5wD0mKcDN73mAkNBJq6GPwKo7KJ6pm0ySFamSa9QI=; b=dGFKwJZdrS3zUY7PsI39fJUy7WSS9izq1uutWsgWIb1jw9gNmdfYJ/UichKDVh9kpN QwyEJ88KAC6NEQQjdwAVdM8/iNxhnmHEGDsQWgEHFV6AxOWiYzDI9bNKKuNys2ZQSshs jolEDYNw6WVw+IIDxdFbJT/r2HQNSBQPCUxooGehLmGKXwDmcQneHGLvNLZakKIhTwea hSwec+aRUv7aAR5G+ikUco+HNv3Xf5DExWJ+eL8cDwHacgL19pLZ8DFJaFs9ZDwIGcXA lbT/wAxRhyNGzsElqbm/msQFcP2sL0FgLyYm5ZQZAXjHdbgDktGjRiLUezvgkZWbwmEC Svtw== X-Received: by 10.14.216.2 with SMTP id f2mr4740081eep.44.1365008285698; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:58:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kuru.dyndns-at-home.com (pb-d-128-141-52-173.cern.ch. [128.141.52.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r4sm8487852eeo.12.2013.04.03.09.58.03 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:58:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: suvayu ali Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 18:58:00 +0200 From: Suvayu Ali To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: the future of notmuch-vim? Message-ID: <20130403165800.GI31109@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org References: <871udhcmks.fsf@zancas.localnet> <515b37a1821fc_146e1045e1094149@nysa.mail> <20130403060158.GJ7702@vilya.m0g.net> <515bf1d3cdb5b_79f845e181791@nysa.mail> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <515bf1d3cdb5b_79f845e181791@nysa.mail> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:58:09 -0000 On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:09:39AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: > guyzmo wrote: > > > I personnally prefer a thousand times to use mutt-kz, alot as MUA, and > > vim only for writing mails. [...] > I've tried mutt-kz and alot, and I was utterly dissapointed by both. > > See how snappy and fast notmuch-vim-ruby is[1], alot is much worst in these > respects. > > [1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGD7IbZmnIs I'm a mutt-kz user, and I am not a vim user. That said, I agree with you that both mutt-kz and alot can be slow to start. Opening virtual folders in mutt-kz is quite slow compared to regular maildirectories. And there seems to be no solution yet. For example you can see this message from Karel: -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.