Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B628B431FB6 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 05:52:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6f3hUFrpzsvf for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 05:51:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Greylist: delayed 585 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at olra; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 05:51:58 PDT Received: from hartman.uits.indiana.edu (belushi.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.188]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDC3431FAF for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 05:51:58 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,884,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="130292136" Received: from mssg-relay.indiana.edu ([129.79.1.73]) by irpt-internal-relay.indiana.edu with ESMTP; 18 Apr 2014 08:42:11 -0400 Received: from hartman.uits.indiana.edu (hartman.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.194]) by mssg-relay.indiana.edu (8.14.7/8.14.4/IU Messaging Team) with ESMTP id s3ICgBIx026919; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 08:42:11 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,884,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="130597179" Received: from candy.uits.indiana.edu (HELO mail-relay.iu.edu) ([129.79.1.201]) by irpt-internal-relay.indiana.edu with ESMTP; 18 Apr 2014 08:42:11 -0400 Received: from viking (156-56-93-99.dhcp-bl.indiana.edu [156.56.93.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail-relay.iu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.4/IU Messaging Team Submission) with ESMTP id s3ICg9Cx015585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Apr 2014 08:42:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (1000@localhost [local]); by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 8afe03ff; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 08:42:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Allan Streib To: David Mazieres expires 2014-07-16 PDT Subject: Re: notmuch, OpenBSD issues In-Reply-To: <878ur37b5l.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> References: <871twvokwm.fsf@viking.indiana.edu> <877g6ny3iw.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <878ur37b5l.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+186~g69867c3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-openbsd) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 08:42:09 -0400 Message-ID: <87lhv27qse.fsf@indiana.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 01:04:39 -0700 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:52:08 -0000 David Mazieres writes: > I'm using notmuch 0.17 on openbsd (from the ports tree). My problem is > that notmuch new is just unbearably slow. I don't know if it's because > I'm running the 32-bit (i386) mode or what, but it takes over one second > per mail message. E.g., this is typical of what I see when checking for > new mail: > > Processed 18 total files in 20s (0 files/sec.). > Added 5 new messages to the database. > > Linux is 10 times faster. Have you seen any similar performance issues? I didn't realize there was a port. I don't see it in my tree (amd64, recent 5.5-current). I've been building from the git repo. Anyway, yes I have seen similar on an older Mac OS X install I have at home on a G4 PowerBook. I haven't had "unbearably" slow performance on my amd64 OpenBSD installation, but there is sometimes a noticable lag. I wonder if it would help to enable softupdates on the partition where your database lives? http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#SoftUpdates Allan