Return-Path: <bdale@gag.com>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7EF431FC0
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:51:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id RSaXCcypPWfw for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:51:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from winfree.gag.com (winfree.gag.com [192.133.104.8])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5AB431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:51:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B5A303F;
	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:51:18 -0700 (MST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at gag.com
Received: from winfree.gag.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (winfree.gag.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id wAyn8p53oPyx; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:51:17 -0700 (MST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C05E303B;
	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:51:17 -0700 (MST)
From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
In-Reply-To: <87aaxyfuz4.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
References: <1259267025-28733-1-git-send-email-dottedmag@dottedmag.net>
	<1259788526-14205-1-git-send-email-dottedmag@dottedmag.net>
	<87zl5zfty5.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<87k4x29732.wl%bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca>
	<87bpiefwdq.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87aaxysjdj.fsf@vertex.dottedmag>
	<87aaxyfuz4.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:51:17 -0700
Message-ID: <1261007477.23524.9.camel@rover>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH (rebased)] Handle message renames in mail spool
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:51:20 -0000

On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 10:35 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:

> But the above sounds like the List-Id header is unreliable enough to be
> useless. 

FWIW, that does not match my experience.

> Any reason not to just use something like
> to:notmuch@notmuchmail to match messages sent to a list like this one?

I'd had much better luck matching List-Id than matching addresses in
recent years.  YMMV.

Bdale