Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382D7431FAF for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:29:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oPOr3UNdXxXs for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:29:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79CC0431FAE for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:29:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by bkty12 with SMTP id y12so2219231bkt.26 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:29:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.156.219 with SMTP id y27mr9066453bkw.71.1326929371877; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:29:31 -0800 (PST) Sender: awg@xvx.ca Received: by 10.205.33.73 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:29:31 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [208.77.198.202] In-Reply-To: <87sjjcbofd.fsf@nikula.org> References: <1326737603-21166-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> <1326737603-21166-3-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> <87sjjcbofd.fsf@nikula.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:29:31 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: QRqdxFFrD3INJjpQQ4kdjn8Cpns Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] reply: Add a JSON reply format. From: Adam Wolfe Gordon To: Jani Nikula Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:29:34 -0000 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 16:07, Jani Nikula wrote: > I know I asked you to adhere to notmuch coding style like above, but I > meant in the context of your patch, not elsewhere. Cleanups like this > should really be separate patches. Sorry if I was ambiguous. Oops - my bad. I assumed I had introduced all the spacing problems in the file and blindly fixed them.