Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA49B431FAF for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 05:41:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id paEpl7mOMS1K for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 05:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE651431FAE for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 05:41:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4PCfWKW000706; Sat, 25 May 2013 09:41:32 -0300 Received: from remotemail by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UgDmu-00081b-2J; Sat, 25 May 2013 09:41:32 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 17127 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 25 May 2013 12:41:29 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Felipe Contreras , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] packaging: fedora: general updates In-Reply-To: References: <1367142758-26120-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+69~g360c3c8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 09:41:29 -0300 Message-ID: <87ehcvteo6.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 12:41:38 -0000 Felipe Contreras writes: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Felipe Contreras > wrote: > >> It doesn't seem the spec file is properly maintained, it should be much better >> now, closer to Fedora's one, and with support for Ruby bindings. > > What about these? > Hi Felipe At this point we wait for somebody (else) with Fedora expertise to review the patches. Maybe your ping will inspire someone. Or, at the risk of telling you things you already know, maybe reviewing other people's patches will make them keaner enough to review yours [1]. d [1]: http://notmuchmail.org/contributing/