Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5304D431FAF for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:26:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "Date" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.432 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.432 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[INVALID_DATE=0.432] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Mj1zgn3dG15 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:26:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cryptobitch.de (cryptobitch.de [88.198.7.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0901431FAE for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:26:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.jade-hamburg.de (unknown [85.183.11.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cryptobitch.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEA5D52C887 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:26:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix, from userid 401) id 12327DF2A3; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:26:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de (unknown [193.174.12.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: teythoon) by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2795DF2A0; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:26:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from teythoon by thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1RoCbd-0006PP-Hz; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:26:05 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> To: Patrick Totzke , Jameson Graef Rollins , notmuch@notmuchmail.org References: <4ee8d62a.596ee30a.1833.ffffc33e@mx.google.com> <87k45so36b.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <4eef7faa.c1cae30a.0802.ffffaffb@mx.google.com> <20120120104041.23590.16718@megatron> In-Reply-To: <20120120104041.23590.16718@megatron> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:26:05 -0000 Message-ID: <20120120112605.5324.87866@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de> Subject: Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:26:05 +0100 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:26:12 -0000 Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-01-20 11:40:41) >Quoting Justus Winter (2011-12-21 08:53:23) >>Hey Pazz, >> >>Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-19 19:17:12) >>>Also, should i not get some output when calling afew with -vv ? >> >>Yes you should ;). Here's an example run on my box: >Alright, I do get logging output with upstream master thanks. > >FYI: I found the problem with afew not finding new mails on my box. >I had the following in my ~/.notmuch-config: > > > # tags A list (separated by ';') of the tags that will be > # added to all messages incorporated by "notmuch new= ". > # > [new] > tags=3Dnew; > >I suspect you don't split the config value and thus afew ended up with a f= alse tag "new;". >its just cosmetics but nevertheless.. Hm, actually it does exactly that: def get_notmuch_new_tags(): return notmuch_settings.get('new', 'tags').split(';') Could you post the relevant log messages? >Thanks for afew! I translated my static filter rules and am very much enjo= ying the automagic list-id tags :) >/p Cool :) Cheers, Justus