Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310AF429E20 for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 22:00:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AiQIPV3VNtZ9 for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 22:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA993431FB5 for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 22:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0E066E043C; Sun, 8 May 2011 22:00:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-98-149-172-122.socal.res.rr.com [98.149.172.122]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F6E66E02B3; Sun, 8 May 2011 22:00:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by servo.finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A3536303; Sun, 8 May 2011 22:00:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Austin Clements , Istvan Marko Subject: Re: storing From and Subject in xapian In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 22:00:26 -0700 Message-ID: <87zkmwsc2d.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 05:00:34 -0000 --=-=-= On Wed, 4 May 2011 21:48:39 -0400, Austin Clements wrote: > This is awesome. What was your machine configuration? Does anyone else have an opinions about this patch? It seems reasonable to me (other than a couple errant comments that were left in and should be removed). It seems worth the slight increase in database size for such a nice performance improvement. Unless I hear a strong positive response I'll hold off on considering it for 0.6, and suggest instead targeting it for 0.7. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNx3TqAAoJEO00zqvie6q8UD0QAJoz+xxquHzWgKSyVm1WnSZL W8BQjAQ9c7mWF596UgdQO3azC3w2DELac5c8hPTIAW/jhUoh5oY6dPj4qkWZYO8I IcY3AnqwkaaM0NVazdzjIP9jmvJiZXrA/P/hS2RuI9/PxiHW/FMiHHj6atrvl+J9 yMGJ++mIduo7qijGvtBTn07dMNBM1nlz7zQNu6RLSRrWXLrU02uCn7qNE9dJ9szw m8DoUnZfJ29QGmRwUF/rsskv+lIr1LISWgyqhoZaAcTxP862/G5uSOxnaqx4xBsZ 2U80DCLphkLbApezUazVIR45gzDjNBhihf2LFcoRAtJ428gTEmm198mkH92jQQDc VJZWlPlGznul1eraS5TSvCWsIqkNubOVsSOcB9/dRMCAkh2RY1Jle0DIJTn3izY8 G646A0KN50ibouq8maZcq7wE3rpXGlnjy5z5EXFozTtRDfgcNI7sdWR9jAV2RpnH uMuxXdlaJxqcFGy2W/VlqHKv/jVgFSfCFtnzSlXw3wdcPWynECwgTgVeKx2nyHar M81xk+Nkw8vL8EQrrGysl/y4A8RCcArBKlOCzgARmia5B+0rlrXkaYuxHQW7A1eD FhRN+zn/mDu2a3COwwDE8eVAYv9k75b/ttRNSIM3p60oMBZkKE7wBltNdejP8tN1 BxwJC/OvnFAJJH7U3msd =ka77 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--